Sunday, June 28, 2009

Ernst and Sanger

Monday, June 22, 2009


Sunday, June 14, 2009

Middle East

Most Arabs with whom I have discussed the Arab/Israeli conflict claimed that Jews started it in 1948 and stole the Palestinian land. They add that the "generous Palestinians" had been perfectly willing to share Palestine with the Jews, who as European foreigners, had invaded their lush green oasis of Palestine, stolen their orange groves and and destroyed acre upon acre of Olive trees. Often, Arabs claim that these Jews were not only an invading force of foreigners, but that Jews were also far more powerful than the poor unarmed, peaceloving Arabs. This of course ignores the fact that although many Jews were exiled from Israel by invading forces in the past, some Jews always managed to stay. Jews are not foreigners, but are the indiginous inhabitants of Israel who fought to regain control of their native land for 1800 years. Those Jews who returned in the late nineteenth cetury/ early twentieth century returned to a neglected wasteland full of malaria infested swamps and desert. The accusations of unprovoked violence against Arabs by these Jews is a false claim. It is now time to set the record straight on who threw that first stone.
In every Century since the we lost control of Israel to foreign conquerers, there has never been a time when diasporah Jews did not return to Israel. From 1880 however, we see the first stirrings of Arab nationalism and therefore after this point, the regular occurance of Jews returning from exile is suddenly portrayed as a new and evil situation. The situation these returning Jews found was not the "lush green oasis" of current Palestinian claims.
"With a gradual decline in the quality of Ottoman rule, the country was brought to a state of widespread neglect. By the end of the 18th century, much of the land was owned by absentee landlords and leased to impoverished tenant farmers, and taxation was as crippling as it was capricious. The great forests of Galilee and the Carmel mountain range were denuded of trees; swamp and desert encroached on agricultural land".1
The land the returning Jews lived on was purchased legally. It had not been stolen. The following evidence was given by Haj Amin Al Husseini at a British Royal commision on 12 January 1937.
SIR L. HAMMOND: His Eminence gave us a picture of the Arabs being evicted from their land and villages being wiped out. What I want to know is, did the Government of Palestine, the Administration, acquire the land and then hand it over to the Jews?
MUFTI: In most cases the lands were acquired.
SIR L. HAMMOND: I mean forcibly acquired-compulsory acquisition as land would be acquired for public purposes?
MUFTI: No, it wasn't.
SIR L. HAMMOND: Not taken by compulsory acquisition?
SIR L. HAMMOND: But these lands amounting to some 700,000 dunams were actually sold?
MUFTI: Yes, they were sold, but the country was placed in such conditions as would facilitate such purchases.
SIR I HAMMOND: I don't quite understand what you mean by that. They were sold Who sold them?
MUFTI: Land owners.
MUFTI: In most cases they were Arabs.
SIR L. HAMMOND: Was any compulsion put on them to sell? If so, by whom?
MUFTI: As in other countries, there are people who by force of circumstances, economic forces, sell their land.
SIR L. HAMMOND: Is that all he said?
MUFTI: They were not prevented from selling the land, and mostly the country was in such economic condition as facilitated the sale. If the Government had the interest of these poor people at heart they should have prevented sales and these people would not have been evicted from their land. A large part of these lands belong to absentee landlords who sold the land over the heads of their tenants, who were forcibly evicted. The majority of these landlords were absentees who sold their land over the heads of their tenants. Not Palestinians but Lebanese.
Accounts from the first Aliya mention not only the harshness of the land but also the constant violent attacks by arabs. Those Jews who came to Israel in the first Aliyah were not in a powerful situation as they were struggling just to survive. Those of us who returned to our homeland in this period were not more powerful than our arab neighbors.
"from 1870 until the outbreak of World War I in 1914 — every Jewish town, neighborhood, moshava (village), farm, moshav and kvutza (cooperative and collective settlements, respectively), faced the necessity of protecting itself. At the time, protection was necessary mainly against local Arab thieves, individuals and organized gangs". 2
Attacks by Arabs against Jews were a common occurrance, but rather than detailing every single Arab raid here, I have decided to cover four of the better known outbreaks of Arab violence toward Jews.
1. Tel Hai 1920
2. Bloody Passover 1921
3. The Hebron massacre 1929
4. The Arab Riots 1936 - 1939
Tel Hai - 1920
Former settlement, now a national memorial, in Upper Galilee, northern Israel, near the Lebanese border. One of the first Jewish settlements in northern Palestine, it was intermittently inhabited from 1905, and permanently settled as a pastoral camp and border outpost in 1918. The name (Hebrew: “Hill of Life”) is an onomatopoetic derivation from the former Arabic name, Talha.
According to the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement between Great Britain and France (1916), an expanded Lebanon, including all of eastern Upper Galilee, was to come under French rule after World War I. This satisfied neither the Muslims, who desired an independent Arab Greater Syria, nor the Jews, who preferred British rule. After the war the Muslim Arabs began attacks both on the Christian villages of southern Lebanon and on the isolated Jewish settlements of Upper Galilee. Tel Hay and adjacent Kefar Gil'adi were determined to defend themselves, and Tel Hay was reinforced from Jerusalem by members of Ha-Shomer, the Jewish workers' protective organization, under the command of Joseph Trumpledoor, Zionist pioneer and former hero of the tsarist army. On March 1, 1920, the settlement was attacked by a large band of Arabs; six of the defenders, including Trumpeldor, were killed. The resistance of Tel Hay not only became legendary throughout Jewish Palestine but also was an important factor in the final determination (December 1920) of the northern boundary of mandated Palestine. 3
Bloody Passover - 1921
In May 1921 an outbreak of violence in Jaffa was followed by large scale attacks on Rehovot, Petah Tikva, and other places. 47 Jews were killed and 140 wounded. Arab casualties were 48 dead and 73 wounded, mostly due to action by British troops. The disturbances demonstrated the ability of the Arab masses and revealed the relative weakness of the yishuv. The High Commissioner, Sir Herbert Samual, began to backtrack: he ordered a temporary halt to (Jewish) immigration and entered into negotiations with the Arab Executive Committee. The outcome of these negotiations was the White Paper issued by Churchill on June 1922.4

The Hebron Massacre of 1929

by Shira Schoenberg

For some time, the 800 Jews in Hebron lived in peace with their tens of thousands of Arab neighbors. But on the night of August 23, 1929, the tension simmering within this cauldron of nationalities bubbled over, and for 3 days, Hebron turned into a city of terror and murder. By the time the massacres ended, 67 Jews lay dead and the survivors were relocated to Jerusalem, leaving Hebron barren of Jews for the first time in hundreds of years.
The summer of 1929 was one of unrest in Palestine. Jewish-Arab tensions were spurred on by the agitation of the mufti in Jerudalem. Just one day prior to the start of the Hebron massacre, three Jews and three Arabs were killed in Jerusalem when fighting broke out after a Muslim prayer service on the Temple Mount. Arabs spread false rumors throughout their communities, saying that Jews were carrying out "wholesale killings of Arabs." Meanwhile, Jewish immigrants were arriving in Palestine in increasing numbers, further exacerbating the Jewish-Arab conflict.
Hebron had, until this time, been outwardly peaceful, although tension hid below the surface. The Sephardi Jewish community in Hebron had lived quietly with its Arab neighbors for centuries. The Sephardi Jews (Jews who were originally from Spain, North Africa and Arab countries) spoke Arabic and had a cultural connection to their Arab neighbors. In the mid-1800s, Ashkenazi (native European) Jews started moving to Hebron and, in 1925, the Slobodka Yeshiva, officially the Yeshiva of Hevron, Knesset Yisrael-Slobodka, was opened. Yeshiva students lived separately from the Sephardi community, and from the Arab population. Due to this isolation, the Arabs viewed them with suspicion and hatred, and identified them as Zionist immigrants. Despite the general suspicion, however, one yeshiva student, Dov Cohen, still recalled being on "very good" terms with the Arab neighbors. He remembered yeshiva boys taking long walks late at night on the outskirts of the city, and not feeling afraid, even though only one British policeman guarded the entire city.
On Friday, August 23, 1929, that tranquility was lost. Arab youths started throwing rocks at the yeshiva students. That afternoon, one student, Shmuel Rosenholtz, went to the yeshiva alone. Arab rioters later broke in and killed him, and that was only the beginning.
Friday night, Rabbi Ya’acov Slonim’s son invited any fearful Jews to stay in his house. The rabbi was highly regarded in the community, and he had a gun. Many Jews took him up on this offer, and many Jews were eventually murdered there.
As early as 8:00 a.m. on Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, Arabs began to gather en masse. They came in mobs, armed with clubs, knives and axes. While the women and children threw stones, the men ransacked Jewish houses and destroyed Jewish property. With only a single police officer in Hebron, the Arabs entered Jewish courtyards with no opposition.
Rabbi Slonim, who had tried to shelter the Jewish population, was approached by the rioters and offered a deal. If all the Ashkenazi yeshiva students were given over to the Arabs, the rioters would spare the lives of the Sephardi community. Rabbi Slonim refused to turn over the students and was killed on the spot. In the end, 12 Sephardi Jews and 55 Ashkenazi Jews were murdered.
A few Arabs did try to help the Jews. Nineteen Arab families saved dozens, maybe even hundreds of Jews. Zmira Mani wrote about an Arab named Abu Id Zaitoun who brought his brother and son to rescue her and her family. The Arab family protected the Manis with their swords, hid them in a cellar along with other Jews who they had saved, and found a policeman to escort them safely to the police station at Beit Romano.
The police station turned into a shelter for the Jews that morning of August 24. It also became a synagogue as the Orthodox Jews gathered there and said their morning prayers. As they finished praying, they began to hear noises outside the building. Thousands of Arabs descended from Har Hebron, shouting "Kill the Jews!" in Arabic. They even tried to break down the doors of the station.
The Jews were besieged in Beit Romano for three days. Each night, ten men were allowed to leave to attend a funeral in Hebron’s ancient Jewish cemetery for the murdered Jews of the day.
When the massacre finally ended, the surviving Jews were forced to leave their home city and resettled in Jerusalem.. Some Jewish families tried to move back to Hebron, but were removed by the British authorities in 1936 at the start of the Arab Revolt. 5
The Arab Revolt - 1936 - 1939
Violence again erupted in Palestine in April, 1936. In that month, six prominent Arab leaders overcame their rivalries and joined forces to protest Zionist advances in Palestine. The Arab High Command, as the group was known, was led by the Mufti Haj Amin al Husseini, and represented Arab interests in Palestine until 1948.
The Arab High Command began their protest by calling for a general strike of Arab workers and a boycott of Jewish products. These actions swiftly escalated into terrorist attacks against the Jews and the British. This first stage of the "Arab Revolt" lasted until November, 1936. The second stage began in September, 1937, shortly after the Peel Commission recommended the partition of Palestine. In this second phase, clashes with the British forces became much more severe, as did the attacks on Jewish settlements. 6
In conclusion, we can see that the Arab claim that "Jews were more powerful and started the violence" is not correct. Those Jews who returned to the Holy Land after 1880 purchased barren land at inflated prices. They were not living on stolen land. The Jews cannot therefore be accused of having stolen the land and thus provoking the violence. They struggled just to survive and therefore were not in a powerful position. They also had to fend off constant Arab attacks.
When we consider the current Arab/Israeli conflict, we must take into account that from Tel Hai 1920 to today, there has not been a break in the violence. It has been a constant conflict from the Arab raids after 1880 to the larger flare ups of Tel Hai 1920, Jaffa 1921, Hebron 1929, The Arab Revolt 1936 - 1939 leading through to the further escallationsr of the War of Independance 1948, The Sinai War 1956, The 6 Day War 1967, The War of Attrition 1967 - 1970, The Yom Kippur War 1973, The Intifada 1988 - 1992, Al Aqsa Intifada 1999 - Present. All these conflicts are a continuation of the violence started by the Arabs after 1880. It was Arabs who threw that first stone.
3. Enclyclopedia Britanica
5. Sources: Arutz Sheva, Interview with Rabbi Dov Cohen. August 1, 1999. Ben-David Calev. "To live and die in Hebron," The Jerusalem Post, July 23, 1999.

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Fluoride is Toxic Waste (LITERALLY)

Financial Bailout Plan Keeps Zombie Banks Alive


Financial Bailout Plan Keeps Zombie Banks Alive
Text size

Bob Chapman
International Forecaster
June 12, 2009

On Friday, we had the latest edition of the FDIC “Friday Night Financial Follies” as regulators on Friday shut down Bank of Lincolnwood, a small bank in Illinois, marking the 37th failure this year of a federally insured bank. More are expected to succumb amid the pressures of the weak economy and mounting loan defaults.

Get rid of the Federal Reserve, which is directly responsible for this mess and erect tariffs on goods and services.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was appointed receiver of the failed bank, based in Lincolnwood, Ill., which had about $214 million in assets and $202 million in deposits as of May 26.

All of Bank of Lincolnwood’s deposits will be assumed by Republic Bank of Chicago, based in Oak Brook, Ill., which also agreed to buy about $162 million of the bank’s assets; the FDIC will retain the rest for eventual sale. Bank of Lincolnwood’s two offices will reopen on Saturday as branches of Republic Bank of Chicago.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the deposit insurance fund from the failure of Bank of Lincolnwood will be $83 million.

In a step that would substantially increase the price tag for Bernard L. Madoff’s long-running Ponzi scheme, lawyers for a group of his victims are asking a federal bankruptcy judge to reject the way their losses in the fraud are being calculated.

The customers insist that, by law, they should be given credit for the full value of the securities shown on the last account statements they received before Madoff’s arrest in mid-December, even though the statements were bogus and none of the trades were ever made. According to court filings, those account balances add up to more than $64 billion.

After months of private negotiations and Internet arguments, lawyers for these customers formally put the issue before the federal bankruptcy court in New York in a lawsuit filed late Friday evening, less than a month before the deadline for filing claims for compensation.

The approach they seek would produce a significantly higher tally of cash losses than the formula being used by the court-appointed trustee overseeing the claims process for the Securities Investor Protection Corp., a government-chartered agency financed by the brokerage industry.

The trustee, Irving H. Picard, is calculating investor losses as the difference between the total amount a customer paid into the scheme and the total amount withdrawn before it collapsed.

Customers who qualify are eligible for up to $500,000 in immediate compensation from SIPC. Those whose eligible losses exceed that amount would divide up the assets recovered by the trustee.

Credit card holders who might have used tax refunds to pay down balances apparently spent the money elsewhere as the recession deepened in the first quarter.

That’s one conclusion that may be drawn from data showing the delinquency rate for bank-issued credit cards rose 11 percent in the first three months of the year, according to credit reporting agency TransUnion.

The delinquency rate - card holders who are three months past due - jumped to 1.32 percent this year, from 1.19 percent in the first three months of 2008, TransUnion said.

The average total debt on bank cards also rose, jumping to $5,776 from $5,548 last year.

Balances typically rise in the first quarter, as holiday spending comes due, said TransUnion’s Ezra Becker.

The credit card delinquency rate remains well below the 5.22 percent for mortgages in the first quarter, meaning card holders are trying hard to keep their payments current.

It’s too early to tell how changes in credit card regulations will affect payment rates, Becker said.

- The biggest price swings in Treasury bonds this year are undermining Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s efforts to cap consumer borrowing rates and pull the economy out of the worst recession in five decades.

The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rose to 3.90 percent last week as volatility in government bonds hit a six-month high, according to Merrill Lynch & Co.’s MOVE Index of options prices. Thirty-year fixed-rate mortgages jumped to 5.45 percent from as low as 4.85 percent in April, according to in North Palm Beach, Florida. Costs for homebuyers are now higher than in December.

Government bond yields, consumer rates and price swings are increasing as the Fed fails to say if it will extend the $1.75 trillion policy of buying Treasuries and mortgage bonds through so-called quantitative easing, traders say. The daily range of the 10-year Treasury yield has averaged 12 basis points since March 18, when the plan was announced, up from 8.6 basis points since 2002, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The trend of employment in the U.S. strengthened in May for the first time in 16 months, a report said Monday.

The Conference Board said its May employment trends index rose 0.2% to 89.9 from April’s revised level of 89.7 that was originally reported as 89.5. The May index was down 20% from a year ago.

In May, the percentage of firms not able to fill positions right now, the percentage of consumers who think jobs are “hard to get”, real business sales and job openings showed improvement.

The privately owned Federal Reserve has subjected us to a 22-month period of massive excess liquidity. The present increase in liquidity, formerly known as M3, which is no longer published because it’s not cost efficient, or there isn’t sufficient interest in the figures, says the Fed, is growing at about 18%. The major purpose for the US Treasury and the Fed to commit to an increase in spending of $14.8 trillion is to bail out banking, Wall Street and the insurance industry, all of which turned prudent investment into a casino.

The method chosen to deal with a financial crisis caused by unsustainable debt created by excess liquidity is to create more money and credit and channel it to the financial sector to reflate their balance sheets, which are debt infested with toxic CDO and ABS debt. The rich on Wall Street, banking and insurance are deleveraging with the taxpayer taking all the risk, as the public gets very little in return. We are surrounded by financial zombies, which we keep alive after they almost destroyed our financial system.

Major inflation is the result as wages barely rise and the loss of purchasing power is borne mostly by the poor and the lower middle class. Ever since free trade, globalization, offshoring and outsourcing began about 1980 wages have not kept up with inflation. Production gravitated to the low wage third world exacerbated by massive condoned illegal immigration. This was accompanied by cronic overcapacity that made conspicuous consumption relatively inexpensive. That was joined by much easier credit. Twenty-three months ago we saw an implosion as a result of these policies, which is still with us. Without this continuation of debt the system cannot continue to function and the downward spiral feeds on itself. Everyone is looking for a bottom soon. That isn’t going to happen, stimulus or no stimulus. Handing money to citizens isn’t the answer. In this case 90% has gone to reduce debt.

The first step to recovery is to drastically cut government spending and to lower corporate and individual taxes. Get rid of the Federal Reserve, which is directly responsible for this mess and erect tariffs on goods and services. If we can accomplish that the recovery will begin, but it won’t be easy. It will take years to accomplish.

As a result of flawed fiscal and economic policies nations are facing record deficits. Some like England have been put on negative credit watch, which could lead to a downward re-rating. The US, Japan and others are following close behind. In fact down grades could come before the end of the year. Interest rates are already moving higher and have been since the beginning of the year. Downgrades would bring even higher rates.

The Chairman of the Fed, Ben Bernanke, would have us believe along with other, so-called experts, that monetary easing will come in time to head off hyperinflation. Unfortunately that cannot happen. The minute money and credit is withdrawn from the system it will collapse. The underlying deflationary drag is too great and that drag will take years to diminish. How can our Fed Chairman and our Treasury Secretary think for a moment that they’ll just be able to turn the tap off when their current orgy of spending ends? Politicians unfortunately see this, as only they would, as an opportunity to purchase votes by making sure the spending continues. It will be interesting to watch over the next several years, as many nations scramble in the bond markets to raise money to keep their economies going. There is no telling at this point how high interest rates are going to go.

Our President tells us of trillion dollar plus deficits are far as the eye can see. Those deficits assume 3% growth rates in GDP, which is not going to happen and the end of the Bush tax cuts. Deficits will be much larger than the Congressional Budget Office estimates, if due to nothing more than exploding entitlement expenditures. This plan involves the perpetual rolling of $5 trillion in Treasury paper much of which is held by foreigners plus the new debt incurred, plus the interest on the existing debt. Do you really believe foreigners are going to fund such deficits indefinitely? We don’t think so with a falling dollar. The dollar is falling again and interest rates are rising and they both are going to continue to do so, as gold and silver go higher. The minute the Fed began creating money out of thin air to fund Treasury sales, plus buy Treasuries out of the market, plus buy Agency securities and toxic junk to the tune of $2.2 trillion for openers, you had to know the game was over. It’s all-downhill from here. This week 30-year fixed rate mortgages could hit 5-3/4%.

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

Last week we heard the VAT, Value Added Tax, may be on the way. It’s the most vicious of all taxes and you do not want to experience it. It would help solve the problem, but your standard of living will drop 20% if it is enacted. Such taxes cannot come until 2011 because 2010 is an election year. Such taxes will exacerbate the depression. In the end cutting spending is the only answer.

Mr. Obama speaks of the importance of living within our means and not spending money we do not have on things we do not need. Obviously the president hasn’t been told we are in a depression. The less the public spends the deeper the depression gets.

That said Mr. Obama engages in profligate federal spending to deaden the pain and essentially to prolong the financial and economic agony.

Then comes the creative destruction with government deciding who should survive and who should fail by edict. Some call it crony capitalism and favoritism, we call it taking care of fellow Illuminists.

The way Wall Street tells us we need hands on help from Wall Street and banks, which led to this disaster. The president wants economic advisers who are theoreticians. All paper has to be marked to a real market price to clean out the bad assets. Government should not be giving free loans to hedge-funds and private-equity firms, so they will buy assets they would not normally buy. Due to electronic trading, which has led to major trading off established exchanges, and into the dark pools we do not know who is doing what. A net flow of information so that the investors and transparency is nearly gone. Bank holding companies, which own the Fed, can see in advance what their clients are interested in buying and front run those orders in their own accounts. If they make major mistakes they just get bailout out by the Fed.

There is no transparency. We only find out what went on when somebody slips or in some way something gets exposed. Transparency, oversight and accountability do not exist. Most everything important is done in secret. A good example was six months ago when Bloomberg News attempted to force the Fed to reveal the details on more than $2 trillion in loans that went to banks, including Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. The Fed told the court to take a hike and said it was a state secret. We have no word as well who made the short-dated, out-of-the money bets in March of 2008 that Bear Stearns would fail. Those bids paid off in the millions, or why Lehman was allowed to fail and AIG was saved, etc.

Not one banking or Wall Street executive owned up to what really happened to cause the crisis. They are totally lacking in honesty, integrity and decency. As it now stands we’ll never know the true inside story of what really went on. We have seen no civil or criminal charges against any of these crooks. Not even investigations. Whatever happened to RICO?

Over the past 25 years our financial industry has descended into darkness and corruption and the people who caused it are getting away scott free.

Our Treasury Secretary Geithner’s ill-fated trip to China and our president’s recent journey to Germany was humiliating. Crowds as well as the German government were demanding the return of their gold. The US has been giving platitudes to the Germans when the Germans know their gold has been sold or leased. Leasing is tantamount to selling. This story has not been broken in the mainstream media, but in time it will be and when it is propaganda will not deflect the ultimate outcome.

The president and Larry Summers think they can restore confidence and trust in the economy with lies and propaganda, but they are deluding themselves. The stock, bond and capital markets are dependent on confidence, but they are more dependent upon the deplorable state of the foundation on which our economy rests. In 22 months the Fed and the Treasury have accomplished very little except bailing out their fellow elitists in the financial industry with taxpayer debt. The mantra that the worst is over is simply more lies similar to those we’ve heard over and over again. Thus far the smoke and mirrors and the “Working Group on Financial Markets have managed to create a 35% to 50% bear market correction in the averages. Our president, a professional con man and street hustler promises he will always tell you the truth about the challenges we face. Trust him and you will find yourself somewhere out in left field.

Thus far all we have seen is a papering over of the financial system. Our Treasury and Fed offer the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, the Public Private Investment Program, the phony stress test and TARP. The commitment to domestic and foreign financial entities is already at $14.8 trillion. There is no discussion of building a new better system that rewards prudent risks, allocates capital where it is really needed, not in the hands of banking and Wall street. It would as well be a great idea if the SEC and the CFTC started protecting the investors and stop collaborating with Wall Street and Washington to manipulate markets.

When will the rescues of the financial sector end – when it has bankrupted us all? They are the ones who caused all this.

We now have Government Motors at the former General Motors and Chrysler that has been given away to Illuminist Fiat. Is every company, bank and brokerage house in America to be bailed out indefinitely?

Architecture as Riddles in Stone

The Tragedy and Farce of Collective Guilt

Climate pact in jeopardy as China refuses to cut carbon emissions

Alex Jones

vaticanjesuitNWO Says:
March 5th, 2009 at 12:30 am

Jones is an ecumenical vatican shill. Never does he call the Nazi salute what it really is, a ROMAN salute, a salute to the Pope of Rome. Never does he tell you that Hitler was a devout Roman Catholic and his god/king boss was Pope Pius XII; or that Hitler’s atrocities were conceived in the Vatican! Never will he tell you that Stalin was Jesuit trained and his god/king too was the Pope of Rome. Never will he tell you that the Vatican controlled the Fascist/Communist dialectic that was the locomotive that drove the second world war. Nor will he tell you that the purpose of that Vatican inspired dialectic and resulting war was to purge Europe of Protestants, Baptists, Adventists, Jews, Orthodox Christians, and other non-Catholic sects that absolutely rejected the Pope’s self proclaimed power to rule the world by Divine right. Alex Jones will never tell you that the Vatican has fomented all the world’s wars, including the one we are in now. Never will Alex Jones tell you that Ronald Reagan re-established formal diplomatic relations with the Vatican in 1984, relations that were severed with extreme prejudice when in 1867 it was discovered that the Vatican was directly responsible for the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. Never will Alex Jones tell you that Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, Bush 2, and Barack Obama were/are closet papists with Jesuit trained cabinets doing the bidding of their little god/king in Rome by systematically destroying our Protestant Constitution and Bill of Rights and replacing them with Roman Catholic Canon Law (the canonical Patriot Act and canonical presidential directives). Never will Alex Jones tell you that Arnold Schwartzenegger is Roman Catholic and so is his wife and the entire Kennedy family who are bent on getting Arnold elected President so he can repeat Hitler’s Inquisition and finish off this Protestant Constitutional Republic for the Pope, and also to take all the onus away from his puny little Papal King in Rome for whom he works night and day. Never will Alex Jones tell you that the Pope is the Biblical Antichrist and that Canon Law damns virtually every single uniquely Protestant liberty embodied in our Protestant Constitution and Bill of Rights, rights that Pope Pius IX specifically and collectively damned as heretical in his Encylical and Syllabus of Error of 1864. NEVER will Alex Jones tell you that it was the Popes of Rome who first called for a New World Order, a Fourth Roman Reich, a GLOBAL Roman Catholic Empire, a GLOBAL union of church and state, where the Pope makes the laws and the governments of the world impose them with brutal cruelty commensurate with the tenets of the Bloody Council of Trent and the unHoly Roman Inquisition. NEVER will Alex Jones tell you that America, through Roman Catholic control of both political parties and all 3 branches of OUR Government, has become the battleaxe of the Vatican to impose this Global unHoly Roman Empire of the Pope of Rome, the Biblical Antichrist, upon the whole world. He’ll continue to talk endlessly and mindlessly about all the outer layers of the onion without ever touching the core, the Vatican. And NEVER will Alex Jones tell you that the only hope for God’s people is the salvation of Yahushua Ha Messiah who is coming to destroy Rome and all who are found in communion with her. Why? Because Alex Jones is a shill for his blaspheming little god/king in Rome and he does his bidding night and day. Alex Jones has us all listening to him, Captain Kangaroo, and smoking cigarettes and playing solitair with a deck of 51. And the card that Alex Jones has purposely removed from the deck is the Ace of Spades; and the Ace of Spades is the POPE! NEVER NEVER NEVER will Alex Jones tell his audience that the only way to defeat this New World Order of Antichrist without a fight is for all the World’s Catholics and all the world’s Apostate Ecumenical Protestants and all the other apostate ecumenical religions of the world to simply abandon the Pope, the Roman Catholic Cult, the Whore of Revelation 17 and all her ecumenical Harlot Daughters and starve them all to death before they do it to us.

But he won’t, because he is a shill for his puny little god/king in Rome. And we won’t take it upon ourselves to starve the Witch at Endor because we don’t read and understand God’s Holy Book. Worst of all, we think the Biblical Antichrist, the Pope of Rome, is a man of God. Blasphemy of Blasphemies! And because of our ignorance and apathy and faithlessness and idolatry and disobedience to God’s Holy Law, which we say is dead, crucified with Christ, and we’re all under God’s Grace to sin like the common heathen and thereby make Christ the minister of unrighteousness, now we will suffer our own Inquisition; our OWN Babylonian captivity: the Pope’s New World Order, not under God’s Law, but under Roman Catholic Canon Law, where there is no Grace at all. The only ones who will be saved are those who comply with Revelation 18:4: “Come out of her, My people, that ye partake not of her (Rome’s) sins, and that ye receive not of her (Rome’s) plagues, for her (Rome’s) sins have reached unto heaven and God hath remembered her (Rome’s) iniquities”. I just told you explicitly what Alex Jones will NEVER tell you, because he is a shill for his little god/king in Rome, the little blasphemer in the little red shoes and the funky fish head hat; the diabolical little man in Rome who hails himself, “the Replacement of the Son of God on earth” (Vicar of Christ) and, blasphemy of blasphemies, “Holy Father”!!! God said, “Thou shalt not suffer a Witch to live”. That means we are to STARVE the Witch! Come OUT of this global Roman Catholic system before its too late. And leave Alex Jones alone to shill for his lonely little god/king in solitude. Do it NOW!

Friday, June 12, 2009

Taylor Refuted

Jared Taylor's racist views have been exposed by people from across the political spectrum. Race is a social construct. Not to mention that many groups of people are made up of many so-called "races" like Hispanic people. Differences in skin color, hair, etc. do exist. Yet, these physical differences are a small percentage in the total part of human DNA. Differences in gender do exist, but this doesn't mean that females have less value than males. I have a right to my views and people have a right to agree or disagree with me. Some people believe in the improvement of humans and other don't. Some deny the great contributions of people of color, but I refuse to do so. Some people accept lame, false stereotypes about their fellow man and others don't. Some believe that forced segregration can solve our sin condition and I don't. Some believe in demonizing their fellow man and others don't. Some try to talk about Detriot (which has economic issues. Common sense would dictate that crime rates are high in economically distressed locations) and deny a peaceful rural area of mostly African Americans in Southhampton, Virginia. While some talk about Detriot, I might talk about record achievements of people of color in education in Hampton Roads. It's hilarious to see grown men and women falsely call Barack Obama a Muslim (which is disinformation and a distaction) without seeing the real picture that he's just another puppet of the establishment. Lynn didn't prove that he is a Muslim. She proved that Barack Obama is pro-Muslim. See, there's a difference between being pro-Muslim (yet you don't practice the faith) and being a real Muslim. There is no evidence that he does the pillar, the zadat, or the Hajj. So, unless you can provide me that evidence, to me Barack Obama isn't a Muslim. Also, I've been in gifted classes before and I've seen people of color of there. I'm from a younger generation than you, so this is more common among my time. Also, some ancient Egyptians being black (not all) is a historical fact and I have mainstream sources to prove it.

That outlines history not the question of human equality necessarily. The Israelites were olive skinned to dark skinned as any scholar would tell you since they are originally Semitic. Affirmative action? Some people were denied of rights via 400 years of discrimination and second class citizenship. I don't believe in quotas, but when you are deny oppurutnities for centuries, it's common to see programs to help minorites (who lack oppurtunities and the poor). That isn't affirmative action. That's compassion. Now, I don't believe in quotas, but I do believe in scholarships and other programs to help those disadvantaged. Also, you did omit country club rules, restrictive laws, grandfather clauses, and in the past these things were called the LAW. That's reverse affirmative action. Only someone really decieved would you solely use their personal experiences as an excuse to prejudge a whole group of people (many of whom they don't even know or had contact with). That's irony. I agree with Eric on exposing the Jesuits, etc. but not on all of his views on race: Taylor getting destroyed in a debate with Tim Wise)

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Knights Templar and Solomon's Temple

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Eretz Yisrael

Friday, June 05, 2009

Sotomayor found friends in elite group (The female version of the Bohemian Grove)

Scientology Exposed again

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

The New Age Exposed

Soul Sleep

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

CNN interviews abortionist; invites outrageous smears

The Second Amendment

Monday, June 01, 2009

Alleged George Tiller Shooter Scott Roeder May Have Suffered From Mental Illness


Alleged George Tiller Shooter Scott Roeder May Have Suffered From Mental Illness

by Steven Ertelt Editor
June 1, 2009
addthis_pub = 'sertelt';

Email RSS Print
Wichita, KS ( -- Scott Roeder, the 51-year-old Kansas man who authorities have detained as the only suspect in the shooting of late-term abortion practitioner George Tiller, may have suffered from mental illness. That's according to his ex-wife, who said in a recent interview that Roeder always held extremist views.
Lindsey Roeder, who divorced Roeder in 1996 after 10 years of marriage, told the Topeka Capital-Journal that Roeder had a mental evaluation in the mid 1990s.
Although he did not believe he had any mental health issues, “everyone else did," she told the newspaper.
“He just felt these were his views,” she said of his position supporting the killing of people who kill others, such as abortion practitioners. "He followed the view of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”
"It scared me," she said of his approach, which has been linked to militia and anti-government groups and attitudes.
Meanwhile, Roeder's family released a statement, according to the newspaper, saying. “We are shocked, horrified and filled with sadness at the death of Dr. Tiller and the circumstances surrounding it that may have involved Scott Roeder."
The statement confirmed the mental health problems, but said Roeder was otherwise a nice guy.
“We know Scott as a kind and loving son, brother and father who suffered from mental illness at various times in his life," it said. "However, none of us ever saw Scott as a person capable of or willing to take another person’s life. Our deepest regrets, prayers and sympathy go out to the Tiller family during this terrible time.”

After serving 16 months in prison following a parole violation after officials found a license plate altered with anti-government slogans and bombmaking materials in his car and home, a Shawnee County District Court judge said Roeder presented a "threat of danger to the public."
Law enforcement officials told the Capital Journal newspaper at the time that Roeder was a "loving" but "obsessed" man, but maintained they didn't expect him to actually hurt anyone.
Roeder has no links to any legitimate pro-life group other than a couple of postings on a public forum on a pro-life web site. Otherwise, he has never been a volunteer of, staff member of or in any way associated with either national, state or local pro-life groups.
That and hundreds of condemnations of the Tiller shooting from pro-life groups hasn't stopped abortion advocates from exploiting Tiller's death for political gain and blaming pro-life advocates for his death.

Ron Paul, the Jesuits, etc.

here Mike Delaney of "" gets punched in the face for his garbage and then wants to accuse the person. listen carefully as the jewish man finds fault with the way Delaney saying it. I found fault with Delaney for the same exact reason.

Delaney also throws in there the DISINFO that Chertoff wrote the Patriot Act. this is a famous piece of disinfo he is sowing there. same crap alex jones spreads. But we know Viet Dinh was the main architect of the patriot act, Jesuit Georgetown Professor Viet Dinh and also a most notable member of the board of directors of the powerful Newscorp.

This Mike Delany came on the scene within a month after me and Phelps and Oxley went public about Alex Jones. He started off accusing Jones of not blaming the Zionists. I thought immediately that this Delaney was an agent.



"Prothink" Delaney is almost certainly an agent - or at least at the outside an egotistical fascist with a blindside to Rome. However if my memory serves me correctly Papal Knight of St Gregory Rupert Murdoch's relative Eric Hufschmid had a page on Daryl Bradford Smith's site, accusing Jones of being a Zionist agent, before the big push was made to expose Jones' connections with Jesuit-trained Knight of Malta Pat Buchanan & Jesuit-trained JBS Pres. John F. McManus. So although Delaney's restatement of this may have been later it wasn't without precedent from his clique.

Personally I think that both Viet Dinh & (Israeli dual-national in a top US Govt position - no dual-national should have top Govt positions in any other nation) Chertoff should have the heat on them, but almost certainly the "Patriot Act" is a Jesuit creation.



> Here is a link to photos of Ron Paul taken at Jesuit Georgetown. This
> one is very telling! One person commented on this photo and noticed
> the Masonic compasses behind him on the wall above "LaGrange" which I
> think might be the name of dormitory, but I'm not sure.
> Possibly Masonic handshakes.
> The Just-War Theory is Roman Catholic being the work of Augustine
> ("City of God") and Thomas Aquinas ("Summa Theologica") and not
> biblically Christian as Ron Paul would have others believe. He claims
> the U.S. has rejected the "Christian" Just War Theory. This idea is
> purposely misleading in that this nonsense was behind-the-scenes used
> as the impetus for this Papal Crusade in the Middle East. In fact,
> according to this article, "Bush Brought a Gift for the Pope: The
> Alliance Between Catholics and Evangelicals" Bonesman George W. Bush
> sent Jesuit-trained (at the Order's Pontifical Gregorian University
> who "still teaches in the theological faculties of Rome) Michael Novak
> to the Vatican to "illustrate the theological justifications for his
> decision to go to war in Iraq." Remember Jesuit Avery Cardinal Dulles
> said in Dec. 2004 at a Temple University symposium moderated by two
> Knights of Malta, "there can be no abandoning of [Augustine's and
> Aquinas'] just-war principles" and "the infliction of harm has to be
> justified."
> "Bush
> Brought a Gift for the Pope: The Alliance Between Catholics and
> Evangelicals"
> This is quoted from the "Catholics for Ron Paul" blog
> "Thomas Peters, who runs the blog American Papist, contributes to a
> blog called Catholics for Ron Paul. He noted that since the Vatican
> hasn't spoken magisterially about the Iraq war, Catholics can continue
> to debate the issue. "He [Paul] has philosophical and rational reasons
> for why he thinks that American involvement isn't the best choice,"
> said Peters. "He examines the question using principles of just war
> theory, specifically speaking about the Christian tradition of a just
> war," he added.
> Paul mentioned the Vatican's comments regarding the Iraq War when
> paying tribute to John Paul II's legacy. "The Pope's commitment to
> human dignity, grounded in the teachings of Christ, led him to become
> one of the most eloquent spokesmen for the consistent ethic of life,
> exemplified by his struggles against abortion, war, euthanasia and the
> death penalty," he said on the floor of the House of Representatives
> on April 6, 2005, four days after the Pope's death."
> In a future email I'll go into some info that shows Ray McGovern, Noam
> Chomsky (a quote he gave of JPII and his denial of the true
> conspirators of 9/11 shows with whom his allegiance lies) and several
> others authored the book "Neo-Conned" published by IHS Press which
> makes it appear as if the Jesuits are against the neocons when
> neoconservatism is yet another political ideological creation of the
> Company.
> Brother Nick


Y'know Niko

I was wondering the same myself, as I hadn't researched the guy, but his name came to my attention when Amazon sent me an email about his book, as from my buying habits they no doubt though that would me just my thing.

So I've just checked his WikiP entry. The last paragraph IMO gives the game away:

"In December 2007, Estulin appeared on the Alex Jones Show, and claimed that he had "received information from sources inside the U.S. intelligence community which suggests that people from the highest levels of the U.S. government are considering an assassination attempt against Congressman Ron Paul because they are threatened by his burgeoning popularity"[3][4] as a presidential candidate. Estulin has worked with American journalist Big Jim Tucker who has a similar interest in the activities of the Bilderberg Group[5]."

The Ron Paul thing is a joke! If the media don't present you as a viable candidate, then there's no chance of winning, forget it. So why kill him? He's more valuable alive, keeping the heat off of the Knights of Malta, the Jesuits & the Papacy. They don't want some martyr on their hands.

Living in Spain you say? Hmm, some of his stuff was published in Spanish originally. If he's not making the connections between the Jesuits & the power elite of Europe, then he may well be Opus Dei or some other kind of Jesuit asset. "Big Jim" Tucker? Fits right into the John Birch Society type mould & almost certainly a C-I-A asset. I read "useful idiot" Jon Ronson's account of him in his book "Them" & reading in between the lines it was clear that Tucker was mostly just exposing himself.

For more on Ron Paul see:

For more on the John Birch Society see:

Insider-commissioned accounts are always worth reading if read with an eye of discernment, so I wouldn't say don't check them out. There's not too much else in book form on them - plenty on the internet though.

Cheers -



Dear Robert,

Let's not forget that Ron Paul's link to Louis Lehrman is a clear indication of his loyalty to the Vatican. For Louis Lehrman is a racially Jewish convert to Roman Catholicism and is a Knight of Malta. Further, via Lehrman, the Knights of Malta are the real backers for the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which includes the North American Union and the loss of American sovereignty.

Nice post.

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 3:57 AM
Subject: The New Hampshire Vote Fraud

> Hi,
> Shortly after the supposed Vote Fraud during the New Hampshire Primary,
> FOX news launched a question how it could be that Ron Paul got so many
> supporters from the 911 for truth movements. "Did Congress man Ron Paul
> recently change his view on the 911 attacks?" Ron Paul denied flat that
> 911 was a inside job. FOX news really out-FOX-ed the alternative media
> by asking this. I myself also started wondering. How can this be?
> Here's my take on Ron Paul. EVERYBODY KNOWS 911 was a planned job to
> get the Patriot Act passed, and ignite a boom in surveillance
> technology, adding a new economic branch into the Military Industrial
> Complex. Elaborating on WHO exactly did 911 is without a official
> INDEPENDENT authoritative study not a wise thing todo during an ongoing
> election campaign. I guess Ron Paul supporters who know all about 911
> are forced to give Ron Paul the advantage/benefit of the doubt, and
> pass over $20 million into the Ron Paul Campaign coffers.
> But here's where my doubt starts. Is Ron Paul really the guy who is
> going to cleanup The Washington D.C. Beltway? I personally fear not.
> Here's why. It might be a dead cow, but never elect a US President from
> Texas. We have Dwight Eisenhower, who shortly after WWII allowed
> German people die of starvation. Then there's Lyndon Johnson, who sure
> was into the deal to have his former boss JFK get shot. And then we
> have the Bushes. A lot of trouble has been invented, organized and
> implemented from TX. Like the Ross Perot Campaign the Ron Paul Campaign
> does have it odd quirks. We just discussed the 911 issue but there's
> more. Ron Paul DID co-publish this book "The Case for Gold" with
> hard-core neo-con and PNAC co-founder Lewis Lehrman. Today that should
> be reasons enough for doubt, but why has the same book recently been
> re-published through the Ludwig von Mises Institute? Here's the URL to
> that re-published book :
> Then we have the New Hampshire Vote fraud, where both Kucinich and Ron
> Paul seem to have lost votes. The mainstream media of course will tell
> you that's bull. And it certainly cannot be denied that the New
> Hampshire Primary could have been spinned into a Vote Fraud by, this
> time, the alternative Internet media. An alternative 911 for truth media
> which has its headquarters in ... TX. So how does one detect if a SPIN of
> the real story is at hand? One harvests articles, video and radio
> reports published during the New Hampshire Primary election night.
> Here's a small story :
> The alternative media _might_ SPIN the New Hampshire Primary drama for
> Ron Paul as a massive vote fraud, but there's more at hand :
> Rob Bishop, a highly active grass roots campaigner to get Ron Paul on
> the GOP ballot, and RBN radio host on Sunday night, had something else
> to comment and called in at the Midnight Rider show by Mike Chambers
> from 11:00 pm - 1:00 am on the night of the election.
> Basicly he claims that the Ron Paul campaign might have raised over
> $20 million but they only spend a couple of 100,000 dollars for the
> New Hampshire Primary. Rudy Giuliani on the other hand, who raised
> almost no money during his election campaign, comes out in New
> Hampshire and spends over $12 million to at least secure his place on
> the ticket.
> Also, in the first hour, Chambers and Bishop [1] concluded that
> according their first examinations no vote fraud was at hand, because
> the vote results from the paper ballot precincts were in total
> agreement with the "Diebold" precincts.
> Regards,
> Robert
> PS.
> [1] The Midnight Rider
> by Mike Chambers, Tuesday Jan 8, 2008, 11:00 pm - 1:00 am
> "Guests: Walter Reddy -- Jim Condit -- and Rob Bishop
> Topic: Dissecting the primary results."
> --
> Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
> Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist

src="" border="0">
Vote For TruthSeeker24's anti-NWO corner
at Conspiracy Top Sites

Custom EU Cookies Notice by this Blog: This site uses cookies to help deliver services. By using this site, you agree to the use of cookies. Got It! Learn More